A couple of things to ponder:
Pasadena Water and Power is formulating its integrated resource plan. That plan will envision where PWP will get its power from and, by extension, what rates Pasadena’s electric customers will pay.
It is clear this planning is in reaction to state, federal and local mandates to use fewer carbon spewing electricity sources and more renewables. I don’t think anyone quibbles with the notion of buying more power from sources such as solar, wind and geothermal, rather than gas and coal generated power.
What we do need to consider is that the new energy will be more expensive. That means it is important to push the power company to do everything it can to tighten its belt, right-size its workforce and streamline its processes to ensure that the cost to PWP consumers is as low as possible.
Perhaps this would also be a good time to examine the totality of costs that face Pasadena utility consumers so we do our best to create a total environment that is competitively priced. Do we really need all those fees, taxes, charges, reserves, transfers and fines? I don’t think anyone would argue with paying more for power if we were assured that, overall, our costs are among the lowest in the region.
Of course , with PWP also looking at restructuring rates for water users, is this achievable?
It would be nice to think there would be an initiative to look at what is costs to live, work and do business in Pasadena and that careful consideration would be given to each and every cost to ensure that, in totality, costs in the City of Pasadena were as low as possible.
Oh, and let’s not forget those fines for overuse of water, though our neighbors in Glendale seem to be mandating excessive water use.
http://www.latimes.com/news/columnists/la-me-lopez6-2008aug06,0,1567219.column
Glendale yard cops are at it again
Mel Melcon / Los Angeles Times
Kimberly Barnes, 18, visits with some of her goats, inside their pen, at her home in Tehachapi. Later this month she will head off to Iowa State University, where she will major in animal science. She plans to become a veterinarian.
More photos >>>
Steve Lopez
August 6, 2008
Here we go again, back to my favorite place in all of Southern California — the city where no good deed goes unpunished.
Glendale.
This time it’s not about the ban on frontyard fences, or a threatened $347,000 fine for a little tree trimming. This time we’ve got a case of City Hall yard cops cracking down on a resident who has gone native, replacing a green but thirsty lawn with drought-resistant plants.
Socially responsible?
Yes.
In compliance with city code?
Not on your life.
If this seems like déjà vu all over again, that’s because the case is quite similar to the one I wrote about in February. Back then, Pete Anderson and Sally Browder were threatened with “criminal charges” after switching from water-guzzling landscaping to native California plants and a rock bed.
“No brown, all green,” an ever-vigilant Glendale official had warned, but the city backed off after a little crusading here in this space.
With that in mind, Glendale resident Dvoshe Walkowiak wondered if I could make another house call.
“Please,” she said in an e-mail. “Glendale is out of control.”
Always happy to help.
On Monday afternoon, I drove out to the house in question. Walkowiak lives on the western edge of the city, and as I approached, I saw one green lawn after another, with sprinklers running at some houses.
In a drought, shouldn’t they be the people who are cited?
Huh?
Paul